1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 104 N.J.
  5. 104 N.J. 32 (1986)
 

RIVERA v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CAS. INS. CO.

104 N.J. 32 (1986)

514 A.2d 1296

ANGEL RIVERA AND RAMONA RIVERA, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, SUBSIDIARY OF THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided September 24, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Fanning argued the cause for appellant (Morley, Cramer, Tansey, Haggerty & Fanning, attorneys; Edward J. Fanning and Thomas M. Kelly, on the brief).

Steven J. Boda argued the cause for respondents (Juman & Juman, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by CLIFFORD, J.

We granted certification, 101 N.J. 223 (1985), to review the Appellate Division's determination that plaintiffs' suit for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -20 (No-Fault Act), was not barred by that Act's statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a). See Rivera v. Prudential Property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases