McCLENDON v. NABISCO BRANDS, INC.

83-10845; CA A33908.

713 P.2d 647 (1986)

77 Or.App. 412

In the matter of the Compensation of Lillie G. McClendon, Claimant. Lillie G. McClendon, Petitioner, v. NABISCO BRANDS, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 29, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elliott Lynn, Beaverton, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Cynthia S.C. Shanahan, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Lawrance L. Paulson and Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


WARDEN, Judge.

Claimant petitions for judicial review of a Workers' Compensation Board order reversing the referee's opinion which ordered employer to accept her claim. On de novo review, we reverse and reinstate the referee's order.

Claimant was an assembly line worker with Nabisco for 13 years, working primarily on the high volume chocolate chip, Oreo and cracker lines. Her work involved quick, repetitive motions, twisting, reaching and lifting loads...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases