1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 117 A.D.2d
  5. 117 A.D.2d 18 (1986)
 

SYMANSKI v. SCH. DIST.

117 A.D.2d 18 (1986)

G. Gregory Symanski, Respondent, v. East Ramapo Central School District, Defendant; Burton Caplan et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 5, 1986

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hinman, Straub, Pigors & Manning, P. C. (William F. Sheehan of counsel), for appellants.

Harp & Harp (Jon A. Simonson of counsel), for respondent.

MOLLEN, P. J., LAZER and GIBBONS, JJ., concur.

RUBIN, J.

The plaintiff, a principal employed by the defendant East Ramapo Central School District (hereinafter the school district) and a member of the defendant union, applied for a longevity increment to which he claimed he was eligible under paragraph E of article XI of a collective bargaining agreement entered into between the union and the school district. The school district denied the plaintiff's application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases