EMERY v. ADJUSTCO

WCB 84-03674; CA A36960.

727 P.2d 622 (1986)

82 Or. App. 101

In the Matter of the Compensation of Lona L. Emery, Claimant. Lona L. EMERY, Petitioner, v. ADJUSTCO and Stayton Canning Company, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 29, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Harri, Albany, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were J. David Kryger, and Emmons, Kyle, Kropp, Kryger & Alexander, P.C., Albany.

Craig A. Staples, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Roberts, Reinisch & Klor, P.C., Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


DEITS, Judge.

Claimant petitions for review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board, claiming that the Board erred in (1) reinstating determination orders of March 14, 1984, and April 3, 1984; (2) denying her aggravation claim; (3) denying additional temporary disability benefits; and (4) denying penalties and attorney fees. In addition, she requests a remand to the referee for a determination of the extent of permanent disability.

On October 5, 1982...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases