MECHIGIAN v. ART CAPITAL CORP.

No. 84 Civ. 4617 (KTD).

639 F.Supp. 702 (1986)

Robert Saks MECHIGIAN, on behalf of himself and all other investors similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ART CAPITAL CORP., Marigold Enterprises, Inc., American Contemporary Art, Inc., Notar Services Corp., Harris Shapiro, Marilyn Goldberg, Harry Gurwitch, Joseph P. Notaro, Sigmund Rothschild, F. Peter Rose, Joseph Gandolfo, and Harry J. Schaare, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 10, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne O. Alpern, New York City, for plaintiff.

Leonard, Kenny & Stearns, New York City, for defendant Joseph Gandolfo; James M. Leonard of counsel.

Booth, Lipton & Lipton, New York City, for defendants Harris Shapiro, Art Capital Corp., Sigmund Rothschild, F. Peter Rose, and Harry Gurwitch; H. Adam Prussin of counsel.

Robert M. Simels, P.C., New York City, for defendants Marigold Enterprises, Ltd. and Marilyn Goldberg.


MEMORANDUM & ORDER

KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge:

Plaintiff, Robert Saks Mechigian, originally brought this action alleging (1) conspiracy to fraudulently induce investment; (2) violation of state securities laws; (3) violation of federal securities laws; (4) fraud, misrepresentation, and deceit; (5) innocent misrepresentation; (6) negligence; (7) breach of fiduciary duty; and (8) breach of contract. By Memorandum & Order dated June 25, 1985...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases