NEWBERN, Justice.
We affirm in this case because the abstract of the record provided by the appellants, pro se, is flagrantly deficient. Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals 9(e)(2).
The appellants appeal from a dismissal of their claim. They argue the case was improperly dismissed pursuant to Ark. R.Civ.P. 41. They contend the case was once dismissed voluntarily in an Arkansas court and then again by a United States District Court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
