CLAUSEN v. CARSTENS

16-82-00713; CA A36595.

730 P.2d 604 (1986)

83 Or.App. 112

Paul CLAUSEN, Albert Clausen, Bel Air Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc., and Bel Air Chrysler, Inc., Appellants, v. Kurt CARSTENS and James M. Gillis, Respondents, Sharon A. Clausen, James C. Todd, and Mary Ann Todd, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 17, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric R.-T. Roost, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellants.

Leslie M. Swanson, Jr., Eugene, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Swanson & Walters, P.C., Eugene.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


YOUNG, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment against them in favor of defendants Carstens and Gillis (defendants) in this action for wrongful receivership, malicious prosecution and other torts. We reverse and remand.

Defendants are lawyers. They represented defendant Sharon Clausen (Sharon) during a bitter dissolution of her marriage to plaintiff Albert Clausen (Albert). As part of that representation they obtained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases