1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 650 F.Supp.
  5. 650 F.Supp. 682 (1986)
 

RUSH v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC.

No. 84 Civ. 3219 (RWS).

650 F.Supp. 682 (1986)

R. Stockton RUSH, III, Plaintiff, v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC., and Scott Seskis, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 23, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Lovell, P.C., New York City, for plaintiff, Christopher Lovell, of counsel.

Gold, Farrell & Marks, New York City, for defendants, Martin R. Gold, Robert P. Mulvey, of counsel.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. ("Oppenheimer") and Scott Seskis ("Seskis") have moved for an order granting summary judgment on the preliminary issue of fraudulent inducement of an arbitration clause or, in the alternative, for an order directing that the issue of fraudulent inducement and the merits of the action be tried before separate juries. For the reasons stated below, both motions are denied.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases