1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 649 F.Supp.
  5. 649 F.Supp. 676 (1986)
 

ARNOLD v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

Civ. A. Nos. 85-2571, 86-2291.

649 F.Supp. 676 (1986)

Clyde J. ARNOLD, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. Charles R. NETHERTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

December 9, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David R. Addis, Joseph E. Kolick, Jr. and Ellen M. Athas of Dickstein, Shapiro & Morin, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Stuart H. Newberger, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Anthony W. DuComb, U.S. Postal Service, Office of Labor Law, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court are defendant's motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment and defendant's motion to strike. After thoroughly considering the record in this case, the Court holds that defendant's motion to dismiss must be treated as a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and that defendant's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases