MOUNTS v. KNODEL

84-0956; CA A36834.

730 P.2d 594 (1986)

83 Or.App. 90

Dennis MOUNTS, Respondent, v. Larry KNODEL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 17, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L.E. Ashcroft, Salem, argued the cause, for appellant. On brief were Sam F. Speerstra, Salem, Frank O. Diarmit, Salem, and Rhoten, Rhoten, Speerstra, Rinehart & Ashcroft, Salem.

Thomas M. Christ, Eugene, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on brief were Louis L. Kurtz, Eugene, and Luvaas, Cobb, Richards & Fraser, P.C., Eugene.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

This is a civil action for damages for personal injury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in excluding evidence of plaintiff's intoxication, in instructing the jury and in striking his allegation of contributory negligence and his affirmative defense that there were "particular and inherent" risks involved in riding a horse. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases