VERCELLOTTI v. HANSEN

78-268-L; CA A33852.

728 P.2d 575 (1986)

82 Or.App. 429

Larry VERCELLOTTI, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. Harold HANSEN, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 19, 1986.

Reconsideration Denied January 16, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney E. Ainsworth, Ashland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on briefs were Jack Davis, and Davis, Ainsworth, Pinnock, Davis & Gilstrap, P.C., Ashland.

Matthew W. Beddoe, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. On brief were Arthur A. Beddoe, and Beddoe & Beddoe, Klamath Falls.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals and plaintiff cross-appeals from the trial court's judgment in this partnership dissolution proceeding. The principal issue defendant raises is whether the trial court erred by refusing to give effect to an unexecuted writing styled a partnership dissolution agreement. According to defendant, plaintiff stood by in silence while defendant changed his position in reliance on the agreement; plaintiff accepted the benefits of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases