WILLIAMS PIPE LINE CO. v. CURTIS BENSON & SONS

Civ. No. 4-85-151.

634 F.Supp. 668 (1986)

WILLIAMS PIPE LINE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. CURTIS BENSON & SONS, INC., a Minnesota corporation; Curtis Benson, an individual, and Robert Arendt, an individual, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Third-Party Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

April 2, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard L. Evans, O'Connor & Hannan, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff.

Terence L. Maus, O'Brien, Ehrick, Wolf, Deaner & Downing, Rochester, Minn., for defendants and third-party plaintiffs Curtis Benson and Curtis Benson & Sons, Inc.

Owen L. Sorenson, Stringer, Courtney & Rohleder, St. Paul, Minn. for defendant and third-party plaintiff Robert Arendt.

Carol B. Swanson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Minneapolis, Minn., for third-party defendant U.S.


DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Williams Pipe Line Company brought this action for damages against Curtis Benson & Sons, Inc., Curtis Benson, and Robert Arendt. Defendant Arendt crossclaimed against Curtis Benson & Sons and Benson (collectively, Curtis Benson). All defendants brought third-party complaints against the United States.1 This matter is now before the court on the United States' motion to dismiss for failure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases