1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 380 N.W.2d
  5. 380 N.W.2d 922 (1986)
 

STATE v. ACKERMAN

No. C2-85-1248.

380 N.W.2d 922 (1986)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Richard Clarence ACKERMAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 11, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Harris I. Darling, Nobles Co. Atty., Kenneth J. Kohler, Asst. Nobles Co. Atty., Worthington, for respondent.

Michael W. Hanson, Bernardy, Scholl & Hanson, Worthington, for appellant.

Considered and decided by LANSING, P.J., and HUSPENI and LESLIE, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

A jury found appellant, Richard Ackerman, guilty of disorderly conduct under Minn.Stat. § 609.72, subd. 1(1), (3) (1984). On appeal, Ackerman argues that: (1) the trial court erred in admitting evidence of Ackerman's attempted suicide; (2) the trial court erred in not allowing defense counsel to recall Ackerman to the stand after the trial court changed its ruling on the suicide evidence; (3) there was insufficient evidence to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases