UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Henry F. FREDEMAN, II; William F. Fredeman Jr., a/k/a "Bill", James W. Crawford, a/k/a "Jim"; Douglas Williams, a/k/a "Doug"; Dennis Keith Foret; Dominic DeTommaso; Buford W. Salter, a/k/a "Red"; Billy Allen Rampy; Ronald May, a/k/a "Ronny"; Buddy Ledoux; James Kelly, a/k/a "Jim"; Randy Douglas Draper; Harold Milstead; Kenneth Tyler; Johnny Bass; Dugan Phillips; Virgil James Parker, a/k/a "Jim"; Billy Splettstosser; Port Arthur Towing; Channel Fueling Service, Inc.; Fredeman Shipyard Inc., Defendants.
United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 13, 1986.
August 13, 1986.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Robert Wortham, U.S. Atty., E.D. Tex., Michael Bradford, Wes Rivers, Paul Naman, Asst. U.S. Attys., for plaintiff.
Robert J. Sussman, Michael Hinton, Pizzitola, Hinton & Sussman, Houston, Tex., for defendants Dominic DeTommaso, Billy Rampy, Tommy Rampy, James Kelly and Dugan Phillips.
Stephen M. Rienstra, Beaumont, Tex., for defendants Buford W. Salter, Ronald May, Buddy LeDoux, Kenneth Tyler and Johnny Bass.
John H. Hannah, Jackee Cox, Offices of John H. Hannah, Tyler, Tex., for defendants Randy Draper, Virgil Parker and Billy Splettstosser.
H.D. Pate, Bridge City, Tex., for defendants Harold Milstead and Larry Wiggins.
Ron Liebman, Patton, Boggs & Blow, Washington, D.C., Gilbert I. Low, Orgain, Bell & Tucker, Beaumont, Tex., for defendants Port Arthur Towing Co., Channel Fueling, Inc. and Fredeman Shipyard, Inc.
Richard Haynes, Robert Wallis and Jan Woodward Fox, Haynes & Fullenweider, Houston, Tex., for defendant Henry F. Fredeman, II.
Gus A. Saper, Ronald H. Tonkin, Houston, Tex., for defendant William F. Fredeman, Jr.
David H. Berg, Joel Androphy, David H. Berg & Assoc., Houston, Tex., for defendant James W. Crawford.
Carl Parker, Danny Doyle, Long, Parker & Doyle, Port Arthur, Tex., for defendants Douglas Williams and Dennis Keith Foret.
United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND OMNIBUS ORDER
HALL, District Judge.
The Court has previously increased the number of peremptory challenges allowed to the Defense from the ten (10) prescribed under Rule 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to a total of fifty-two (52) challenges. Those challenges will be exercised by the attorney representing each Defendant, or group of Defendants, and may be exercised jointly or severally. Such an increase is specifically...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
