CONSUL, LTD. v. TRANSCO ENERGY CO.

Nos. 85-1729(L), 85-1971 and 85-1988.

805 F.2d 490 (1986)

CONSUL, LTD., Appellant, v. TRANSCO ENERGY COMPANY, formerly known as Transco Companies, Inc., and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Appellees. (Two Cases) CONSUL, LTD., Appellee, v. TRANSCO ENERGY COMPANY, formerly known as Transco Companies, Inc., and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided November 14, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dudley H. Chapman (Ward, Lazarus, Grow & Cihlar, Washington, D.C., Reginald F. Combs, House, Blanco & Osborn, P.A., Winston-Salem, N.C., on brief), for appellant/cross-appellee.

John L. Jeffers (David D. Sterling, Baker & Botts, Houston, Tex., Charles F. Vance, Jr., W. Andrew Copenhaver, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Winston-Salem, N.C., on brief), for appellees/cross-appellants.

Before WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and HAYNSWORTH, Senior Circuit Judge.


ERVIN, Circuit Judge:

This case never crosses the threshold of antitrust analysis under § 2 of the Sherman Act.1 There is a mismatch between the assumed natural monopoly power of the defendant, Transco, in the market for transporting gas along its pipeline and the relevant market for Sherman Act purposes that the plaintiff, Consul, has chosen to plead. Consul contended that the relevant product...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases