MULVIHILL v. FINSETH

No. C1-86-1199.

396 N.W.2d 889 (1986)

John MULVIHILL, et al., Appellants, v. Vernon FINSETH, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 27, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark G. Stephenson, Rochester, for appellants.

Robert R. Benson, Preston, for respondents.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER and HUSPENI, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a summary judgment in favor of respondents denying summary judgment to appellants. Appellants contend the trial court erred in granting respondents' motion because (1) genuine issues of material fact exist and (2) respondents are not entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

On October 16, 1980, respondents purchased a parcel of land from appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases