LAW v. ESSICK MFG. CO.

No. C6-86-405.

396 N.W.2d 883 (1986)

David LAW, et al., Respondent, v. ESSICK MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, intervenor, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 27, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Faricy, Jr., Pustorino, Pederson, Tilton & Farrington, Minneapolis, for David Law, et al.

Eric J. Magnuson, Richard J. Nygaard, Jeremiah P. Gallivan, Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel, Minneapolis, for Essick Mfg. Co.

Michael S. Kreidler, Lasley, Gaughan, Stich & Angell, Minneapolis, for Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., intervenor.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LANSING and CRIPPEN, JJ.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

In this products liability case, appellant Essick/Hadco Manufacturing Co. (Essick) alleges error in the admission of expert testimony and the inclusion of certain jury instructions. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent David Law regularly used an Essick Model 1000D cement mixer in his construction job. In January 1980, while operating the mixer, Law slipped on loose sand underneath his feet. He reached with his arm to break...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases