CRACE v. CRACE

Nos. C2-86-904, C9-86-916.

396 N.W.2d 877 (1986)

In re the Marriage of Robert CRACE, petitioner, Appellant, v. Carol CRACE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 27, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Singer, Singer & Singer, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Stephen C. Rathke, Borden, Steinbauer, Rathke & Krueger, Brainerd, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LANSING and CRIPPEN, JJ.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

In this dissolution matter, appellant alleges the trial court erred as a matter of law by classifying appellant's state trooper pension benefits as marital property. Both appellant and respondent claim the trial court abused its discretion in valuing and dividing property. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Robert Crace and respondent Carol Crace were married in 1962 and have three children. In November 1984, the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases