1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 183 Cal.App.3d
  5. 183 Cal.App.3d 1089 (1986)
 

PEOPLE v. FRANCO

Docket No. D003382.

183 Cal.App.3d 1089 (1986)

228 Cal. Rptr. 527

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RUDOLF FLORES FRANCO, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

July 16, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Richard Targow, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Robert M. Foster, Jay M. Bloom and Gil Gonzalez, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

KREMER, P.J.

Rudolf Flores Franco appeals jury convictions for possessing heroin for sale, possessing heroin and possessing drug paraphernalia arguing critical evidence underlying his convictions should have been suppressed because officers failed to give notice of their presence before entering his hut. (Pen. Code,1 § 844.) We agree and reverse.

FACTS

About 6:30 a.m. on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases