1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 350 S.E.2d
  5. 350 S.E.2d 918 (1986)
 

BRUEGGE v. MASTERTEMP, INC.

No. 8629SC613.

350 S.E.2d 918 (1986)

83 N.C. App. 508

Harry C. BRUEGGE and Alma D. Bruegge v. MASTERTEMP, INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 16, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris, Golding, Phillips & Cloniger by William C. Morris, III and Jeff Durham, Asheville, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Collie & Wood by George C. Collie and Charles M. Welling, Charlotte, for defendant-appellee.

JOHNSON, Judge.

The ultimate issue we must decide is whether plaintiffs' evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to them, was sufficient for submission to the jury. See, e.g., Wallace v. Evans, 60 N.C. App. 145, 298 S.E.2d 193 (1982). The purpose of a motion for directed verdict was stated in Wallace, supra, as follows:

Settled principles establish that the purpose of a G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases