1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 515 A.2d
  5. 515 A.2d 743 (1986)
 

STATE v. VAN SICKLE

515 A.2d 743 (1986)

STATE of Maine v. Daniel VAN SICKLE.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided September 24, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David S. Crook, Dist. Atty. Pamela Ames (orally), Asst. Dist. Atty., Augusta, for plaintiff.

Andrea Najarian (orally), Pierce, Atwood, Scribner, Allen, Smith & Lancaster, Augusta, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and SCOLNIK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Daniel Van Sickle appeals his conviction of operating a motor vehicle after suspension, 29 M.R.S.A. § 2184 (Supp. 1985-1986), and after revocation as an habitual offender, 29 M.R.S.A. § 2292 (Supp. 1985-1986), entered after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Kennebec County). Contrary to his first contention, it was not obvious error to allow the prosecutor to refer to the defendant as "a convicted thief" during argument, because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases