1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 391 N.W.2d
  5. 391 N.W.2d 860 (1986)
 

KALLIO v. FORD MOTOR CO.

No. C4-85-2126.

391 N.W.2d 860 (1986)

Robert KALLIO, Respondent, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellant, Tomahawk Ford, Inc., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted October 22, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert R. Johnson, Robert R. Johnson & Associates, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Richard Bowman, Hildy Bowbeer, Cynthia J. Atsatt, Bowman and Brooke, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by NIERENGARTEN, P.J., and LANSING and HUSPENI, JJ.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

The jury returned a verdict for respondent Robert Kallio in his suit against appellant Ford Motor Company that alleged that both the design and accompanying warnings for the transmission on his Ford pickup truck were defective. On appeal, Ford argues that the trial court erred: (1) when it allowed Kallio's design defect claim to go to the jury and refused Ford's requested instructions; (2) when it allowed Kallio's failure to warn...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases