1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 185 Cal.App.3d
  5. 185 Cal.App.3d 1065 (1986)
 

BOWMAN v. CITY OF PETALUMA

Docket No. A031120.

185 Cal.App.3d 1065 (1986)

230 Cal. Rptr. 413

CYNTHIA BOWMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF PETALUMA et al., Defendants and Respondents; DAON CORPORATION et al., Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

September 24, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Drummy, Garrett, King & Harrison, Stephen C. Drummy, J. Scott Schoeffel and Jeffrey M. Richard for Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.

Leslie R. Perry and Luke & Perry for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

No appearance for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

CHANNELL, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in mandamus requiring the City of Petaluma (City) to set aside certain enactments approving a subdivision development. We hold that (1) the trial court erred by extending review of the City's actions beyond the question whether they were supported by substantial evidence; and (2) analyzed by this standard, the City's actions did not violate the California Environmental Quality...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases