1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 391 N.W.2d
  5. 391 N.W.2d 857 (1986)
 

STATE v. PALMER

No. C2-85-1928.

391 N.W.2d 857 (1986)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Stephen Arnold PALMER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 5, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Mark B. Peterson, Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman & Doty, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Richard F. Koch, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and FOLEY and FORSBERG, JJ.

FOLEY, Judge.

Stephen Arnold Palmer appeals his conviction for driving under the influence and driving with a blood-alcohol concentration over .10 in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(a) and (d) (1984) and the denial of his motion for a new trial, citing errors in a number of evidentiary rulings. He further claims that the verdict was not justified by the evidence. We affirm.

FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases