1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 187 Cal.App.3d
  5. 187 Cal.App.3d 1056 (1986)
 

ACME FILL CORP v. SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION

Docket No. A032318.

187 Cal.App.3d 1056 (1986)

232 Cal. Rptr. 348

ACME FILL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

December 11, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Andrea Sheridan Ordin, Chief Assistant Attorney General, N. Gregory Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, and Linus Masouredis, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Appellants.

Stephen L. Kostka, Ronald Scales, Phillip S. Althoff and McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

HANING, J.

Acme Fill Corporation (Acme) sought a writ of mandamus under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5, challenging San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission's (BCDC) exercise of consistency review authority under the Coastal Zone Management Act, 16 United States Code section 1451 et seq. (CZMA). After Acme applied for a federal permit to expand its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases