JOHNSON v. URIE

No. C0-86-920.

394 N.W.2d 846 (1986)

Roger E. JOHNSON, et al., Appellants, v. Joseph URIE and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted December 23, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carol M. Person, Fryberger, Buchanan, Smith & Frederick, P.A., Duluth, for appellants.

Michael W. Haag, Donovan, McCarthy, Crassweller & Magie, P.A., Duluth, for respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and FOLEY, and HUSPENI, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Roger Johnson appeals from a summary judgment determining that a negligence action cannot be maintained against respondents.1 The trial court concluded that, following repeal of Minn. Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 6(e) (repealed 1980), insurers and insurance agents do not have a duty to offer and explain underinsured motorist coverage to insureds. Appellant argues that there is a common law duty to offer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases