MARK IX, INC. v. SURETTE

No. BK-236.

492 So.2d 745 (1986)

MARK IX, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Elizabeth M. SURETTE, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Rehearing Denied August 27, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth R. Ridlehoover, Pensacola, for appellant.

Matt E. Dannheisser, of Emmanuel, Sheppard & Condon, Pensacola, for appellee.


MILLS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a partial final judgment which quieted title to a certain section of real property in Surette, based on the doctrine of boundary by acquiescence. Mark IX contends the evidence at bar is insufficient to meet the requirements of boundary by acquiescence, and the trial court's conclusion cannot be supported by any other reasoning, such as the doctrine of boundary by agreement. We disagree and affirm.

The evidence adduced below...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases