CAMBRIDGE MANAGEMENT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. 84-1415.

515 A.2d 721 (1986)

CAMBRIDGE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RENTAL HOUSING COMMISSION, Respondent. Unita Atkinson, Intervenor.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided October 3, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard W. Luchs, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Karen S. Dworkin, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom John H. Suda, Acting Corp. Counsel at the time the brief was filed, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the memorandum in lieu of brief, for respondent.

John K. Lunsford, Washington, D.C., for intervenor.

Before NEBEKER, MACK and NEWMAN, Associate Judges.


NEWMAN, Associate Judge:

Cambridge Management Company (CMC) petitions for review of the Rental Housing Commission's decision that its property is not exempt from the Rent Control Act. D.C.Code § 45-1501 et seq. (1981).1 CMC argues that its principals only owned four rental units each and did not have any interest in any other rental unit within the meaning of D.C.Code § 45-1516(a)(3).2 We agree...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases