NEGAARD v. MILLER CONST. CO.

No. C4-86-581.

396 N.W.2d 833 (1986)

James T. NEGAARD, Appellant, v. MILLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 21, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen J. Snyder, Winthrop & Weinstine, St. Paul, for appellant.

Frederick L. Grunke, Donohue, Rajkowski, Hansmeier, Grunke & Jovanovich, Ltd., St. Cloud, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LANSING and CRIPPEN, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

James Negaard appeals from an order upholding the validity of a promissory note over his claims of usurious interest. We affirm.

FACTS

In June 1976 James Negaard contracted with Jim W. Miller Construction Company to build a house. Under the contract, Miller agreed to send Negaard monthly progress billings, due 30 days from the billing date with 12 percent interest on overdue amounts.

After promptly paying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases