STILL v. HUNTLEY

No. 17037.

729 P.2d 489 (1986)

Arthur STILL, Executor and administrator of the Estate of Jack Still, Appellant and Cross-Respondent, v. Grant H. HUNTLEY, Respondent and Cross-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

December 18, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Haase & Harris, Reno, for appellant and cross-respondent.

John R. Brydon, Reno, for respondent and cross-appellant.


OPINION

PER CURIAM:

In January of 1984, J.W. Still (Still) filed a complaint against Grant H. Huntley (Huntley) alleging fraud and breach of a statutory mining partnership agreement. On behalf of Huntley, his counsel, Timothy W. Dixon (Dixon), answered with a general denial.

On April 24, Still brought a motion to compel discovery because Huntley failed to appear for his deposition. The unopposed motion was granted. Huntley again failed to respond...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases