1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 22 Ohio
  5. 22 Ohio St. 3d 99 (1986)
 

OHIO FURNITURE CO. v. MINDALA

No. 85-415.

22 Ohio St. 3d 99 (1986)

OHIO FURNITURE COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. MINDALA, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 12, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Duda, Elk & Wohl and John E. Duda, for appellant.

Ugan & Relic and Grant D. Relic, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The issues presented in this appeal are: (1) whether Local Rule 11(C) is unconstitutional, and (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the case with prejudice. We hold that Local Rule 11(C) is constitutional, but that the trial court improperly dismissed the case with prejudice.

Local Rule 11(C)1 sets forth a seven-day limitation period within which responses to motions must be filed....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases