STATE v. AUMAN

No. C9-86-107.

386 N.W.2d 818 (1986)

STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Richard Faye AUMAN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied July 16, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Robert M.A. Johnson, Anoka Co. Atty., Barbara J. Harrington, Asst. Co. Atty., Anoka, for appellant.

C. Paul Jones, Public Defender, Ann Remington, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and LESLIE and CRIPPEN, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing evidence obtained in a warrantless search of respondent. The state contends the pretrial court erred in excluding the evidence either because respondent consented to the search, or the search was reasonable under the emergency exception.

FACTS

Respondent Richard Auman was charged with one felony count of possession of a schedule II controlled substance and one

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases