1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 503 A.2d
  5. 503 A.2d 684 (1986)
 

HENRY J. KAUFMAN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. 85-237.

503 A.2d 684 (1986)

HENRY J. KAUFMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided January 24, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Levy, for petitioner.

N. Denise Wilson-Taylor, Washington, D.C., with whom Michael A. Milwee, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for respondent.

Before TERRY and STEADMAN, Associate Judges, and REILLY, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In the case before us, the Department of Employment Services affirmed a decision by an appeals examiner holding that a claimant for unemployment compensation was qualified for benefits because the termination of her employment was not due to misconduct within the meaning of D.C. Code § 46-111(b) (1984 Supp.). The employer has filed a petition for review, contending that the record clearly established misconduct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases