1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 475 U.S.
  5. 475 U.S. 709 (1986)
 

ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC. v. WORTHINGTON

No. 85-195.

475 U.S. 709 (1986)

ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC. v. WORTHINGTON ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 21, 1986

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clemens H. Barnes argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were James D. Rolfe and Erik Rosenquist.

Carson F. Eller argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.*

JUSTICE REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court.

Respondents sued their employer, petitioner Icicle Seafoods, Inc., to recover overtime benefits to which they thought they were entitled under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U. S. C. § 207(a)(1). After a 2-day trial, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington held that respondents were excluded from the overtime benefits of the FLSA by 29 U. S. C. § 213(b)(6), which...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases