1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 642 F.Supp.
  5. 642 F.Supp. 539 (1986)
 

IN RE CENCO INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

MDL No. 291, No. 75 C 2227.

642 F.Supp. 539 (1986)

In re CENCO INCORPORATED SECURITIES LITIGATION. SEIDMAN & SEIDMAN, Plaintiff, v. CENCO INCORPORATED, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

July 10, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Weisbard, McDermott, Will & Emery, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

David E. Springer, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

In our November 26, 1984 opinion in this case, we denied Cenco's motion for summary judgment and dismissed Seidman's cross-claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 601 F.Supp. 336 (N.D.Ill.1984). In so doing we thought we had "laid to rest the dispute over the meaning of the settlements and of the opinion of the Seventh Circuit [686 F.2d 449

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases