1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 185 Cal.App.3d
  5. 185 Cal.App.3d 996 (1986)
 

RAPID TRANSIT ADVOCATES v. S. CAL. RAPID TRANSIT

Docket No. B015827.

185 Cal.App.3d 996 (1986)

230 Cal. Rptr. 225

RAPID TRANSIT ADVOCATES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

September 23, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rogers & Wells, Charles R. Hartman, Robert D. Donaldson and Charles E. Wheeler for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Nutter, Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert & Matz, Vincent J. Marella, Dorothy Wolpert, Richard T. Powers and Suzanne Gifford for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

ADLER, J.*

In this appeal we are asked to decide if the proposed Metro Rail project of the Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD) is required to be consistent with the general development plans of counties and cities. (Gov. Code, §§ 65300 and 65700.) We hold there is no such requirement.

FACTS

This case arises from the final administrative decision of respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases