1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 730 P.2d
  5. 730 P.2d 428 (1986)
 

HAERTEL v. SONSHINE CARPET COMPANY

No. 16299.

730 P.2d 428 (1986)

James HAERTEL, a minor, By and Through his mother, Jean Borregard, as next friend and Jean Borregard, individually, Appellants, v. The SONSHINE CARPET COMPANY, Clark County School District, and Dow Chemical Company, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

December 23, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank J. Cremen and Galatz, Earl & Catalano, Las Vegas, for appellants.

Richard B. Parnell, Las Vegas, for respondent Sonshine Carpet Co.

Barker, Gillock & Perry and Janice J. Brown, Las Vegas, for Clark County School Dist.

Rawlings, Olson & Cannon, Las Vegas, for respondent Dow Chemical Co.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Jean Borregard instituted this action on her own behalf and that of her son, James Haertel ("James"). She alleged that James was employed by respondent Sonshine Carpet Company ("Sonshine") as a laborer; that Sonshine had entered into a joint venture agreement with respondents Clark County School District ("the District") and Dow Chemical Company ("Dow") to remove and replace carpeting at some of the District's facilities; and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases