1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 339 S.E.2d
  5. 339 S.E.2d 817 (1986)
 

TATUM v. TATUM

No. 8514SC714.

339 S.E.2d 817 (1986)

Jean S. TATUM v. Frank TATUM.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 4, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Vann, Durham, for plaintiff-appellant.

Bryant, Drew & Patterson, P.A. by Victor S. Bryant, Jr., Durham, for defendant-appellee.

WHICHARD, Judge.

Plaintiff's sole contention is that the court erred in denying her motion to set aside the verdict on the contributory negligence issue.

Where no question of law or legal inference is involved, a motion to set aside the verdict is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and its ruling is not subject to review in the absence of an abuse of discretion. (Citations omitted.) But when a judge ... grants or refuses to grant a new trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases