1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 389 N.W.2d
  5. 389 N.W.2d 759 (1986)
 

EICHINGER v. WICKER ENTERPRISES, INC.

Nos. C7-85-1181, C2-85-1640.

389 N.W.2d 759 (1986)

Julie EICHINGER, et al., Respondents, v. WICKER ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied August 27, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kelly S. Rask, Forest Lake, for respondents.

Robert G. Wicker, pro se.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and WOZNIAK and RANDALL, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Appellant contends that he is entitled to a new trial due to the exclusion of certain evidence, improper closing argument, newly-discovered evidence, and insufficient evidence to sustain the verdict. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondents Julie Eichinger and Karen Proulx were both employed by appellant Wicker Enterprises, Inc. In April 1981, they brought suit against appellant, alleging nonpayment of wages and wrongful detention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases