1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 178 Cal.App.3d
  5. 178 Cal.App.3d 970 (1986)
 

ADAMEK & DESSERT v. AGRIC. LABOR RELATIONS BD.

Docket Nos. D002985, D003006.

178 Cal.App.3d 970 (1986)

224 Cal. Rptr. 366

ADAMEK & DESSERT, INC., Petitioner, v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent; UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Real Party in Interest. UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent; ADAMEK & DESSERT, INC., Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

March 11, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff & Tichy, Scott A. Wilson, Scott A. Johnson, Ewing, Johnson & Macklin and William F. Macklin for Petitioner and Real Party in Interest Adamek & Dessert, Inc.

Daniel G. Stone and Michael E. Hersher for Respondent.

Dianna Lyons and Daniel A. Garcia for Real Party in Interest and Petitioner United Farm Workers of America.

OPINION

STANIFORTH, Acting P.J.

The petitions for review filed by Adamek & Dessert, Inc. and the United Farm Workers of America, AFL-CIO have been reviewed and considered by Acting Presiding Justice Staniforth, and Justices Wiener and Work. The petitions are denied. (See Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 335 [

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases