RUUD v. RUUD

No. C9-84-2015.

380 N.W.2d 765 (1986)

Diane M. RUUD, n.k.a. Diane M. Coppens, petitioner, Appellant, v. Charles A. RUUD, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 31, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rebecca H. Frederick, Edina, for appellant.

Terry L. Hegna, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

By order of this court, Diane M. Ruud, n.k.a. Diane M. Coppens, has obtained further review of that portion of the Court of Appeals' decision dealing with Charles A. Ruud's spousal maintenance obligation. The majority of the panel reversed the trial court in this regard, essentially concluding that Diane's remarriage terminated Charles' obligation to make a $10,000 payment due according to the terms of the judgment and decree on May 15, 1984...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases