WILLIAMS v. SIGLETON

No. 20212.

723 P.2d 420 (1986)

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. James B. ESPINOZA and Darla Espinoza, Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of Utah.

August 4, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven L. Hansen, Murray, for defendants and appellants.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Dave B. Thompson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.


HOWE, Justice:

This is an appeal by defendants from a nonjury conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute for value, a third degree felony, in violation of U.C.A., 1953, § 58-37-8(a)(ii). Defendants raise three issues: (1) insufficiency of the evidence, (2) improper admission of expert opinion testimony, and (3) insufficiency of the probable cause statement to support the issuance of the search warrant.

On December 5,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases