PER CURIAM.
We are affirming the order being appealed as we interpret it as having considered only two specific matters; namely, a writ of garnishment for past, not future payments, and an issue of jurisdiction of the person, not of the subject matter. We do not decide any issue of the applicability of garnishment for future alimony nor the right to modification.
ANSTEAD, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.