Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant contends that the judgment convicting him of third degree grand larceny must be reversed because the court failed to instruct the jury sua sponte that the guilty plea entered by his accomplice could not be considered as evidence of defendant's guilt. Defense counsel elicited this information on cross-examination to impeach the accomplice's credibility. The question has not been preserved for our review...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
