RANDALL v. LOFTSGAARDEN

No. 85-519.

478 U.S. 647 (1986)

RANDALL ET AL. v. LOFTSGAARDEN ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided July 2, 1986


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Arthur Brunig argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Terence M. Fruth and Ted S Meikle.

Deputy Solicitor General Wallace argued the cause for the United States et al. as amici curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Fried, Acting Assistant Attorney General Olsen, Albert G. Lauber, Jr, Ann Belanger Durney, Teresa E. McLaughlin, Daniel L. Goelzer, Paul Gonson, Jacob H. Stillman, Richard A. Kirby, and Martha H. McNeely.

John M. Friedman, Jr., argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.*

Edward Brodsky and Thomas H. Sear filed a brief for Envitex Realty Corp. as amicus curiae urging affirmance.


JUSTICE O'CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question presented is whether the recovery available to a defrauded tax shelter investor, entitled under § 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 or § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to rescind the fraudulent transaction or obtain rescissory damages, must be reduced by any tax benefits the investor has received from the tax shelter investment.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases