1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 703 S.W.2d
  5. 703 S.W.2d 420 (1986)
 

ALTMAN v. BLAKE

No. 07-84-0272-CV.

703 S.W.2d 420 (1986)

Hazel ALTMAN, et al., Appellants, v. W.R. BLAKE, III, et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.

Rehearing Denied February 19, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald Huffaker, Huffaker, Green & Huffaker, Tahoka, for appellants.

Donald M. Hunt, Carr, Evans, Fouts & Hunt, Lubbock, for appellees.

Before REYNOLDS, C.J., and COUNTISS and BOYD, JJ.

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

The question presented in this summary judgment action is whether the language used in two deeds effected a conveyance of an undivided one-sixteenth (1/16) royalty interest or an undivided one-sixteenth (1/16) of all the oil, gas and other minerals. Considering opposing motions for summary judgment on stipulated material facts, the trial court determined, and rendered judgment decreeing, that the deeds conveyed an undivided one-sixteenth ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases