KNIGHT v. REW

28922; CA A34886.

720 P.2d 397 (1986)

79 Or.App. 694

Dolores J. KNIGHT, Appellant, v. Lawrence B. REW and Corey, Byler & Rew, a partnership consisting of George H. Corey, Alex M. Byler and Lawrence Rew, Respondents, and Nick Chaivoe, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 4, 1986.

Reconsideration Denied July 3, 1986.

Review Denied July 29, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Ehrlich, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Larry O. Gildea, P.C., Eugene.

John H. Kottkamp, Pendleton, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Kottkamp & O'Rourke, Pendleton.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

This is a legal malpractice action. Plaintiff appeals the trial court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment on the ground that her claim was time-barred. ORS 12.110(1). The dispositive issue is whether a genuine issue of material fact was raised as to when plaintiff knew, or should have known, that she had a malpractice claim against defendants. We reverse and remand.

We summarize the facts in the light most favorable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases