1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 392 N.W.2d
  5. 392 N.W.2d 724 (1986)
 

BOSOLD v. BAN CON, INC.

No. C9-86-60.

392 N.W.2d 724 (1986)

Donald D. BOSOLD and Ruth A. Bosold, Appellants, v. BAN CON, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 2, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen J. Poindexter, Poindexter, Jacobson, Stromme & Harwood, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Robert L. Meller, Jr., Norman J. Baer, Best & Flanagan, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by FOLEY, P.J., and HUSPENI and CRIPPEN, JJ.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellants Donald and Ruth Bosold seek damages for the alleged decreased value of their townhouse arising from respondent Ban Con, Inc.'s (Ban Con) construction of a townhouse adjacent to theirs. The trial court granted Ban Con summary judgment on the basis that the Bosolds did not have a valid easement of view and that any contract to convey an easement of view was too indefinite to enforce and lacked consideration. The Bosolds appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases