1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 185 Cal.App.3d
  5. 185 Cal.App.3d 919 (1986)
 

BANK OF AMERICA v. HENKIN

Docket No. B016998.

185 Cal.App.3d 919 (1986)

230 Cal. Rptr. 113

BANK OF AMERICA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MORRIE R. HENKIN, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

September 22, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Robert James Smith for Defendant and Appellant.

Frandzel & Share, Stanley W.W. Kesselman and Daniel Alberstone for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

EAGLESON, J.

In this avoidable single-issue appeal, we conclude that respondent's motion for summary judgment complied with the 28-day notice requirement of Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (a).1 We therefore affirm the judgment entered in respondent's favor and impose sanctions against appellant's attorney for pursuing a frivolous...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases