BLOOM v. VILLAGE OF BUDA

No. 3-86-0019.

145 Ill. App.3d 957 (1986)

496 N.E.2d 361

DORA BLOOM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE VILLAGE OF BUDA et al., Defendants (Arvell Barnett et al., Defendants-Appellants).

Appellate Court of Illinois — Third District.

Opinion filed July 31, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ann Burkey, of Pierson, Maloney & Rayfield, of Princeton, for appellants.

Fred Potter, of Potter & Comba, of Princeton, for appellee.


Judgment affirmed.

JUSTICE HEIPLE delivered the opinion of the court:

The trial court denied the appellants', Arvell and Barbara Barnett's, section 2-611 motion for attorney fees from the plaintiff, Dora Bloom. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 2-611.) The Barnetts appeal. We affirm.

On August 13, 1985, the plaintiff filed suit against the village of Buda, its mayor and board of trustees, and the Barnetts. The plaintiff asked for issuance of a writ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases